So, I was looking to get a “photo of Tiger Woods” the other day. Seemed like a simple enough task, right? You just type it into the good ol’ internet and bam, photos galore. That’s what I thought, anyway. Turns out, it’s not always that straightforward, especially when you’re after something specific, or, you know, just trying to do things the “modern” way.

My First Go-Around
Alright, so first thing I did was hit up the usual search engines. You know the drill. And yeah, tons of pictures. Tiger smiling, Tiger swinging, Tiger looking serious. But here’s the thing: a lot of them were, well, not quite what I needed. Some were tiny, some were plastered with watermarks bigger than his golf ball, and others just looked like they were taken with a potato back in ’98. It’s a real jungle out there when you’re looking for a clean, decent image.
I spent a good while sifting through pages, clicking, zooming, squinting. It’s like panning for gold, except most of what you find is just mud. I remember thinking, “This used to be easier, or maybe I just had more patience back then.”
Then Came the “Bright Idea”
Then this thought popped into my head: “What about those AI image generator things?” Everyone’s yapping about them. “Create any image from text!” they say. So, I figured, why not give it a shot for my Tiger Woods photo? Seemed like a quick fix. A bit of a shortcut, maybe. I’m usually wary of these newfangled shortcuts, they often end up being the long way around, if you catch my drift.
So, I found one of those AI tools, typed in “photo of Tiger Woods, playing golf, sunny day.” Pretty specific, I thought. I hit ‘generate’ and waited. What came back… well, it was something.
Let me tell you, it was a mixed bag, and that’s putting it mildly.

- One image had Tiger with what looked like three hands on the golf club. Super weird.
- Another had his face looking kinda… melty? Like a wax figure left in the sun.
- And the golf clubs! Sometimes they looked more like twisted metal sculptures than actual clubs.
It was like asking a kid who’s only heard descriptions of Tiger Woods to draw him. Close, but no cigar. Some were almost passable from a distance, but up close? A real mess. It reminded me of some projects I’ve seen where folks just throw a bunch of new tech together without really understanding it, hoping it’ll magically work. Usually just creates a bigger headache down the line. This AI Tiger felt like that – a collection of data points vaguely resembling the real deal, but missing the soul, you know?
What’s the Point, Really?
This whole experiment got me thinking. Back in the day, a photo meant something. A photographer was there, captured a moment. There was craft. Now, we’re trying to conjure things out of thin air with algorithms. It’s fast, sure. But is it better? Are we just chasing convenience so hard we forget about quality or, I don’t know, reality?
It’s like this trend in so many industries. Everyone wants the quickest, cheapest, most automated way to do everything. Sometimes it works out, but a lot of the time, you end up with something that’s just… off. Like my AI Tiger with the melty face. It’s there, it technically meets the prompt, but it’s not right.
Why do I know all this stuff about chasing things that aren’t quite right? Well, I once worked for a place, a big tech company, you’d know the name. They were always jumping on the “next big thing.” New programming language, new framework, new management fad. Didn’t matter if it actually solved a problem better, or if anyone on the team knew how to use it properly. It was all about appearing cutting-edge. We spent more time rewriting old stuff in new ways than actually building anything genuinely useful. One time, they decided our entire perfectly functional system needed to be rebuilt in some obscure language someone read about in a blog post. Six months later, total chaos. The new system barely worked, and the old one was a distant memory. We had the digital equivalent of a three-handed, melty-faced Tiger Woods on our hands. It was a nightmare to maintain, nobody was happy.
So yeah, that little quest for a “photo of Tiger Woods” ended up being a bit of a trip down memory lane, and a reminder that sometimes, the old ways, or at least the more thoughtful ways, have their merits. In the end, I went to a proper stock photo site and found a great, professionally taken photo. Cost a little, but it was real. No extra hands, no melty face. Just Tiger Woods, looking like Tiger Woods. Sometimes, you just gotta stick to what works, even if it’s not the shiniest new toy on the block.
